http://www.vovotv.com/ok-how-is-this-for-an-updated-theory-on-jo-yeates-the-missing-bristolian/
So we know she went to Waitrose and Tesco Express and bought a pizza. We know she made it safely back to the apartment as her bag was there along with the receipt showing the pizza she had bought. We also know the boyfriend had set off that evening to Sheffield to visit relatives.
However the pizza and its wrapping is completely missing. Now I like to watch real life crime drama’s on tv and Im reminded of a profiler who once remarked that in every case he’s investigated where a clean up of the crime scene is involved, its
a family member or someone who is comfortable with the house and is sure they won’t be disturbed.
Which leads me nicely onto the boyfriend.
Fact 1 – He was co-incidentally away the time she went missing.
Fact 2 – He went away by himself to see relatives, yet he was to visit HER relatives over the Xmas period.
Does this not seem strange that he would go to see relatives all by himself and she ‘couldnt be bothered’ to go with him, yet he happily goes along to her families xmas do? I don’t know about you but ever girl Ive ever been with would always invite themselves along to a family dinner, not go ‘Oh no you go by yourself, Im busy here this weekend’
.
Fact 3 – He did not hear from her all weekend, but was not worried at all by this. He then got back at 8pm, but did not call police till midnight. He did this because he noticed that in her bag was her keys and purse and other stuff she would take with her when going outside.
Does this not seem strange that after being ignored by her all weekend, he gets home and notices she not there, then takes 4 hours before he calls police?
And heres the other thing.
The reason given by the boyfriend for her staying back in Bristol and not going with him was that she wanted to get the flat done up for a party they were having on Tuesday and she needed to prepare food etc. Would he have not immediately thought it strange upon entering the flat, that she had done NO cleaning up, nor ANY preperation for the party at all?
All of this leads me to the mystery of the missing pizza and why its so important to the police that they actually featured it in their press conference.
If the police were to search the apartment they would naturally find the boyfriends prints/DNA everywhere, so nothing would seem out of place.
But WHAT if they were to find this pizza or its wrapping and find the boyfriends prints or DNA on that?
That wouldnt be possible, because he was driving off to Sheffield and was nowhere near the pizza. Unless of course he WAS at the flat at the time, had an argument in which, as she was eating the pizza, the pizza was thrown or got onto him and thus now becoming a vital bit of evidence.
I put it to you, members of the jury, that the one critical piece of evidence that could have put someone at a place where they shouldnt have been was delibrately removed from the scene. I also put it to you that the fact no-one noticed anything strange indicates that it was unlikly a ’stranger’ was involved.
I also put it to you that it would not seem unusual for the boyfriend to say wheel a ’suitcase’ out to his car, because hey he was going off to Sheffield for the weekend and everyone needs to pack clothes etc.
Finally why are the police giving detailed time-by-time analysis of the path she took going home, yet not mentioning at all, when the boyfriend said he left Bristol. When he actually showed up in Sheffield. In fact his brother said to reporters ‘Ive told the police the timelines and have been told not to say any more.’
Why? If the boyfriend was at Sheffield by say 9pm it would put him completely in the clear. Why doesnt the police release this information to stop speculation?
I’ll tell you why, because the times, Ladies and Gentlemen do not tally up.
